Gratitude Journal for Thanksgiving

thank-you

It’s wonderful to have a holiday like Thanksgiving devoted to gratitude.  Taking the time to feel grateful might help us shift a negative outlook by forcing us to contemplate the good things in life.  Seligman would have us keep regular gratitude journals to improve our sense of well-being.  My own partner and I always try to talk about three things we are grateful for each day.  But I am generally terrible at this, so I need help.

pat-snlLuckily, I heard a “Giving Thanks” show on NPR featuring actress Julia Sweeney, who created the androgynous character Pat on Saturday Night Live.  She talked about some of the things she was grateful for.  My favorite offering by Sweeney was that she was thankful for the margin for error that her life allowed her.  I can relate to that.  I am truly grateful that I have been able to make mistakes in my own life and have still been able to flourish.  So many folks in the Global South live on the knife’s edge, where mistakes are impossible to recover from.  Another great point Sweeney made was that she was grateful for a stable community.  Consider all the folks who live in war zones from Afghanistan to Somalia.  Even here in Oakland, many folks must feel they are in a war zone with all the murders going on.

Now let me get back to futurism.  It may be that we need to develop meaningful happiness by cultivating gratitude in order to update our negative filters and recognize the path toward a future with better outcomes, to regain the optimism America had back in the 60s, but lacks now.  So let’s all recognize what we have to be grateful for.  Our future may depend on it.

Why Do Scientists Disdain Supplements?

I’ve been taking supplements for a long time now. Gretchen, my partner of many years, gave me a niacin flush back when we were in our 20s. I can’t say that I recommend it. Imagine taking enough niacin to turn bright red all over and feel as though your entire body was being pricked by needles for a couple of hours. Also, I just learned that the fact that I flushed at all is evidence that I probably wasn’t schizophrenic in the first place, which may come as a surprise to my friends from that time. I was even fed Flintstone’s chewable vitamins as a child, so I feel as though I grew up in a culture of supplementation. Why do I take them? To be healthier? More productive? To live longer? Take your pick.

So when I read Fantastic Voyage by Ray Kurzweil, it was right up my alley. I happily went out and bought the top twenty supplements that Ray & Terry were suggesting right away. My friend John warned me about this. He had initially tried the same strategy, but stopped in favor of eating whole foods. We haven’t learned enough about biology yet to know what will be effective, he said. But John had the discipline to sit and eat an entire tub of organic lettuce while chatting at my Futurist Meetup, and I doubted that I had his same level of resolve. So I reduced my confidence in supplements, but I figured they might help offset my shoddy diet.

As the years go by, more and more studies about supplements have shown a lack of efficacy or even detrimental effects. Of course I was quick to defend my beliefs and look for flaws in the studies, blissfully ignoring my own confirmation bias. Sure, the science is flawed in some cases. Maybe big pharma actually works to game the results since naturally occurring substances that can’t be patented could pose competition to its products if proven effective. But as irrational as I may be in defense of my pet concepts, my confidence in supplements erodes further and further over time.

But as irrational as I may be in defense of my pet concepts, my confidence in supplements erodes further and further over time.

In this Bay Area futurist scene, it isn’t hard to find plenty of folks looking for hacks to optimize their personal performance. Rationalists seem particularly fond of nootropics, etc. So my faith in supplements was bolstered somewhat by various things I learned. I might say, oh sure, maybe even mixed tocopherol vitamin E isn’t very effective, but surely this acetyl-glutathione will do the trick. You just need to find the right pill to pop.

As I got involved in Quantified Self, where everyone does self experimentation, I realized how utterly foolish I was being by not monitoring my biomarkers more frequently. Ray Kurzweil might choke down 200 pills a day, but he’s constantly getting blood work done and poring over the results. So my approach of performing a single liver test once a year wasn’t looking too responsible, especially when other QS’ers were monitoring their blood sugar in real time for kicks.

I also had jarring experiences trying to talk about supplementation with actual scientists. Several smart biologists mocked my supplement regimen. Recently, I was at a party and asked Joe Betts-LaCroix and some other science people if anyone followed the paleo diet or did supplements, and I was a bit surprised to find general disdain. Should we return to a paleo era life expectancy? Perhaps we should forego vaccines and sanitation as well? Joe referred me to his brief blog post on this topic, the gist of which being that although there are billions of people with a broad range of diets, no one population is extraordinarily long lived. Thus, we can assume that diet doesn’t contribute much to longevity.

Although there are billions of people with a broad range of diets, no one population is extraordinarily long lived. Thus, we can assume that diet doesn’t contribute much to longevity.

Now some might argue that this speaks to longevity, but not to performance. Maybe it can be shown that diet and supplements can improve performance. At one time I would have been more open to that idea, but I am starting to grow skeptical. Joe’s point is that folks should stop wasting large amounts of effort for small or nonexistent personal gains and should focus instead on the basic research needed to unlock the deep complexity in the foundations of our biology. Of course, not all of us are cut out to do that research.

Dan Millman actually touched on this point at Ted X Berkeley this year. Millman ponders the question of whether it is better to focus energy on improving the world or on improving ourselves. He concluded that self improvement gives us the leverage to change the world more effectively. I am no great fan of Millman’s productized philosophy. He’s like some of these other “gurus” who package up ideas as products and sell them in a way that seems as though they have never heard punk rock or read post-modernism. But I think I can agree with that point – self improvement lends leverage to our endeavors. The question then becomes a cost/benefit analysis. At what point does self improvement offer diminishing returns?

Joe is an interesting person to listen to in this regard. No one can accuse him of not working on himself. He was a big QS’er from the beginning and did calorie restriction for years. He does HIIT, and he even broke out and tried living a 28 hour day. He has also been working fervently to improve the world for years, from his work at the ill fated Halcyon Molecular to his current Health Extension Salon project to combat aging. Yet, here he is admonishing folks to stop piddling around with diet and supplements and get to work on the real problems of this world.

Then there is this other fellow I happen to know named Walter Funk. A friend shared an article about a TA-65 alternative supplement that can supposedly increase your telomeres and roll back aging. This seemed at first to be utter quackery, yet there in the references, low and behold, was a paper by the venerable Dr. Walter Funk. So I said, Walter, tell me, what is this nonsense? He said that the basis of TA-65 is astragalus and that it modestly but reproducibly increases telomerase activity (i.e. protects telemeres which keep your DNA from unraveling, sort of like the plastic on the tips of shoelaces). He pointed out that astragalus is just an herb and regulation of herbs is becoming lax, but that other organic compounds that are purported to increase telomere activity would require clinical trials for FDA approval.

Then I found this article which seemed to suggest that telomerase might contribute to the immortality of tumor cells. But Dr. Funk assured me that reasonable animal data suggested that telomerase might actually prevent cancer. The telomerase activation associated with tumors occurred at a later stage after a bunch of other damage had occurred. So I said, well, that sounds OK then. Do you take TA-65, Walter?  But I got a sardonic reply about him relying on good women and the kindness of strangers. He also offered to forward me a summary of all the NIH supplement studies that showed no benefit or some detriment.

Furthermore, when Cynthia Kenyon spoke at the Health Extension Salon in July 2013, she mentioned a study which showed that antioxidants prevent the increase of insulin sensitivity following physical exercise. In other words, exercise causes stress which normally triggers your body to repair the damage, however, antioxidants seem to prevent your body from recognizing the damage that has occurred. So antioxidants fix some of the damage, but prevent your body from providing a more robust response. This goes hand in hand with recent research, which calls into question the long held belief that aging is caused by oxidative stress (or free radical damage). There’s something else going on here.

Recent research calls into question the long held belief that aging is caused by oxidative stress (or free radical damage).

Part of me wonders if there is something in the personalities of scientists that makes them disdain diet and supplementation. Gretchen suggested that they may all be absent minded professors forgetting that their brains are attached to bodies that need nutrients. The performance hackers seem like a more charismatic and risk tolerant crowd, almost thrill seeking, though I must say they seem to have fewer papers to their credit. At the end of the day, I suspect that scientists disdain diets and supplements because they hold assertions of efficacy to higher standards than many of us do. I strongly suggest that my fellow supplementers listen more closely to what the science is trying to tell us. I will attempt to do the same, although it sure isn’t easy to give up your imagined silver bullet.

Additional references:
Walter sent me these additional references for those of you who are still clinging to your vitamin bottles. (I probably need to read these myself in order to let go.)

Here’s the big flop of one of the most touted supplements, omega-3 for heart disease has absolutely no effect on normal individuals.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Prevention/38969

No one, especially males, should take vitamin E (tocopherol).
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/newsfromnci/2011/SELECTupdateJAMAOct2011

Antioxidants have been shown to not help with cancer.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/prevention/antioxidants

An attack on the low carb crowd from a microbiome investigator.
http://humanfoodproject.com/sorry-low-carbers-your-microbiome-is-just-not-that-into-you

Health Extension Salon #14: Greg Fahy Regrew His Thymus

Greg Fahy and Joe Betts-LaCroix at Health Extension Salon #14.  Photo courtesy of Traci Parker.

Greg Fahy and Joe Betts-LaCroix at Health Extension Salon #14. Photo courtesy of Traci Parker.

Health Extension Salon yet again lit up my life with wonderment at Hacker Dojo in Mountain View.  As usual, there was a great crowd of lively and brilliant attendees.  I got to chat with some old acquaintances and some new folks as well.   I met techno optimist Kevin Russell, whose website Serious Wonder is worth consideration.   Being the hip traveller that he is, he just got back from the Singularity University’s FutureMed conference down in San Diego.  He promised that he would be writing it up soon.  When pressed for a highlight, he mentioned something about laser surgery at the nucleus level, which sounds fascinating.  So I will be looking forward to his write-up.  He also pointed out that Craig Ventner has a new book on synthetic life called Life at the Speed of Light.   Russell mentioned the CRISPR technique that allows for precise gene editing, which is back in the news these days. George Church was excited about CRISPR back in January at Foresight this year.   So it looks like CRISPR may not be another one of these flash in the pan science blurbs that go nowhere.  Let’s keep an eye on it.

Health Extension Salon founder Joe Betts-Lacroix always gives an introductory talk during which he highlights the goal of the Health Extension Salon, “to accelerate efforts toward therapies to prevent age-related diseases.”  He makes a strong case that aging research needs more funding given the huge cost of age-related diseases.  Joe mentioned a recent geroscience summit at the NIH to further this cause.  The NIH is a vast source of research funding, but aging research only represents a tiny fraction of that pie.  This summit gave the geroscience community within the NIH a chance to share some of their findings with their peers at the NIH who work in other fields.  The goal was to raise interest and possibly funding for basic research into the biology of aging.

Joe also mentioned Google’s new health extension company, Calico, headed by Art Levinson of Genentech and Apple.  I guess Joe was impressed when he saw Levinson at this aging research conference scribbling madly away, taking notes.  Not many CEO’s do this sort of thing, so it may bode well for Calico.  I had previously heard that Levinson has a vast network of connections, and now it seems that he is immersing himself in the field to learn what directions to explore firsthand.  Very promising indeed.

The next Health Extension Salon will be a fundraiser held at Mithril Capital.  Check healthextension.co for details.  Mithril is Thiel’s vehicle for investing in middle range companies that fall between the initial startup phase and the pre-IPO.  Nonetheless, it wouldn’t be a bad idea for bright young founders in need of funding to show up and rub elbows with the well heeled hosts.  Just saying.

Joe introduced Greg Fahy by playing a clip from a recent episode of Nova that features Fahy’s work in the cryopreservation of organs.  Apparently Fahy was able to find an antifreeze (M22) that is nontoxic to mammals and allowed him to freeze and rethaw a functional rabbit kidney.  This research could lead to organ banks in which human organs could be safely stored long-term.  It seems that Alcor switched to M22 in 2005 for freezing heads, but I am not sure if they still use it.  But that was just a glimpse into the polymathic Fahy’s varied work.

When Fahy took the mic, he outlined the goal of his new company, Intervene Immune, to  combat immunosenescence (the crapping out of your immune system over time) by rejuvenating the thymus.  The thymus is this organ behind your breastbone that is sort of a university for white blood cells.  Apparently it degrades severely as you age until it basically dries up by the time you are 65. (Am I the only one who didn’t even know this about the thymus?)  The immune system incompetence that results from the aged thymus shriveling up results in a lot of flu deaths.  Fahy said that some think this thymus degradation is an adaptive trait since the thymus must discard most of the T-cells it educates and thus is highly energy intensive.  Though he seemed to agree with Cynthia Kenyon that aging may be a programmed process.

Fahy was inspired by the work of Dr. Laura Napolitano, who showed that human growth hormone could reverse this thymic involution (shrinking of thymus with age) in AIDS patients.  Now given that AIDS kills T-cells, but a regenerated thymus makes more and better T-cells, that’s a really good thing. Go Dr. Napolitano, go!  Though we westerners have pills to fight AIDS pretty effectively, it’s still a huge problem in the global south, and this thymus regeneration approach might be a better solution there.

So Fahy decided to regrow his own thymus using growth hormone and DHEA.  Yep.  He just performed an N=1 experiment by himself, on himself.  It was very difficult and expensive though.   First of all, HGH (human growth hormone) blocks insulin function.  So that’s a problem.  Fahy figured out that DHEA counteracts this effect.  He speculated that the high HGH levels in young people didn’t impact their insulin function due to high levels of DHEA.  DHEA has a plethora of other beneficial side effects, so that was a win win situation.  Another problem is that HGH works by stimulating IGF-1, but IGF-1 can cause cancer at high levels.  So the HGH dosage must be carefully controlled to keep IGF-1 levels in range.  But he figured it all out and he estimates that he was able to basically roll back the clock 25 years in terms of this thymus function.   He physically regrew the organ as evidenced by MRI scans.  He also showed that his level of good “naive” T-cells increased.  That’s a good thing.  Look it up.

Now Fahy is a super scientist who vitrifies rabbit organs by day and unlocks thymic magic by night, so definitely don’t try this at home.  Sign up for his human trial instead.  Intervene Immune is kicking off a Thymus Regeneration, Immunorestoration, and Insulin Mitigation Trial (TRIIM).  This study is for men only, between 50-65 years old, in good health, with low cancer risk, who have not used HGH before.  Contact Fahy [at] interveneimmune.com for information on how to join.  If I was a little bit older, I would definitely check it out.  Fahy has worked out a very rigorous protocol in which he improves upon previous protocols by Napolitano, et al.  He also looks amazingly good for his age, and I have to wonder if that thymus rejuvenation hasn’t helped preserve his appearance as well.

But as amazing and exciting as the real prospect of immunorestoration is, that’s not all Fahy has in store.  Killer T-Cells attack invaders. The thymus trains these T-cells to differentiate between invaders and native tissues.  In autoimmune disorders such as Type-1 diabetes, this process goes astray.   I guess animal studies have succeeded in taking small sections of the affected tissue, putting them into the thymus, and retraining the T-cells not to attack that tissue.  (Still looking for references.)  Fahy said that the same thing has been done with organ transplants in animals.  So you could transplant organs without needing to knockout the immune system.  Just trick the thymus into treating the transplanted organ tissue as native.  This is really mind-blowing stuff.  Thymic magic.

I have to extend my thanks and admiration to Joe and the Health Extension Salon team for putting on yet another inspiring and mind-expanding event.  It’s really exciting to see the amazing talent being applied to these tough problems of aging.  Even my persistent pessimism is disarmed by the audacity and vision of people like Greg Fahy.  Aging really is a problem that can be conquered. Human suffering can be vastly reduced.  Get on board people!  Let’s make it happen.